Skip to content

Suggestions from January review on §1.1 #192

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2025
Merged

Suggestions from January review on §1.1 #192

merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2025

Conversation

pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

@pchampin pchampin commented Apr 23, 2025

Bob DuCharme's 1st comment
https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]

I agree with Bob. The triple is the entire "Subject-Predicate-Object" construct, not just the arc labelled with "Predicate".


Preview | Diff

Bob DuCharme's 1st comment
https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]

I agree with Bob. The triple is the entire "Subject-Predicate-Object"
construct, not just the arc labelled with "Predicate".
@pchampin pchampin added the spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial label Apr 23, 2025
@pchampin pchampin requested review from gkellogg, afs and hartig April 23, 2025 23:30
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented May 1, 2025

I'm changing this to editorial.

@pfps pfps added spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) and removed spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial labels May 1, 2025
@afs afs merged commit b353571 into main May 1, 2025
1 check passed
@afs afs deleted the 2025-01-reviews-s1.1 branch May 1, 2025 17:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants